top of page
Writer's pictureCody Harnish

Understanding Your Rights: A Message from Cody Harnish

Updated: Dec 5, 2024

As a service member, you are entitled to unique protections under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) that differ from civilian legal rights. My goal today is to clarify these differences, specifically between Miranda Rights and Article 31(b) under the UCMJ, and explain why choosing specialized legal representation like Harnish Law can be critical when your rights are under scrutiny.

 

The Civilian Standard: Miranda Rights

You've likely heard the Miranda Rights recited in countless TV shows and movies: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney…” These rights kick in when a civilian is taken into custody and before interrogation begins. They are designed to protect individuals from self-incrimination and ensure they are fully aware of their legal protections.

 

Article 31(b) of the UCMJ: Tailored for Military

For those in uniform, Article 31(b) provides similar, yet broader, protections. Unlike Miranda Rights, Article 31(b) doesn’t require you to be in custody to be applicable. It’s enough that you are being asked questions by a superior, and these questions could potentially incriminate you. You must be informed of the nature of the accusation and advised of your right against self-incrimination before such questioning begins. This is a significant safeguard that reflects the unique structure and demands of military life.

 

Why the Differences Matter

The distinction between when these rights are triggered—custody under Miranda vs. any potentially incriminating questioning under Article 31(b)—is crucial. It means that as a military member, your rights are protected in a wider array of situations, but it also means navigating these rights can be more complex.


Moreover, the consequences of a violation of these rights differ significantly. In the civilian world, failure to provide Miranda warnings generally leads to the exclusion of any confession from trial. In military courts, the rules can be less straightforward, with more discretion given over the admissibility of evidence.

 

Why Harnish Law is the Right Choice

Understanding these nuances is key to effectively navigating military legal challenges, which is where Harnish Law comes in. Our firm is dedicated to military law, with deep expertise in both the protections under the UCMJ and the broader legal environment affecting service members. We are committed to ensuring that you fully understand your rights and are adeptly defended through every step of the legal process.

 

Choosing the right legal counsel is crucial, and it’s not just about responding to immediate challenges. It’s about proactive protection of your rights and your career. At Harnish Law, we provide that proactive, knowledgeable defense tailored to the unique aspects of military law, ensuring you are defended both robustly and respectfully.

 

Final Thoughts

If you find yourself in a situation where your rights as a service member are questioned, remember that Article 31(b) affords you comprehensive protections. At Harnish Law, we’re here to help you navigate these protections. Trust in our expertise to guide you through your legal challenges with the respect and rigor you deserve.

 

 

At Harnish Law, PLLC, we are committed to providing exceptional legal representation for U.S. military service members worldwide.

DEFENDING AMERICA'S DEFENDERS™


 

6 views0 comments

Comentarios


bottom of page